Apple will reportedly launch 3 brand new iPhones next year, and the first could launch soon

Apple will reportedly launch 3 brand new iPhones next year, and the first could launch soon
iphone-6c-1
Earlier this year, rumors claimed that Apple would have three new iPhone versions in stores in 2015, but subsequent reports disputed those claims. Some argued that Apple had canceled the smallest model in its iPhone 6s family – thus far referred to as the iPhone 6c – while others said the phone might still be on track for release at a later point.

Now, a new report says that Apple is still making the handset, though the new 4-inch iPhone won’t launch until next year.
According to chatter from the semiconductor industry, Apple is looking to equip the iPhone 5c successor with FinFET chips, Digitimes says.
Mass-produced by Samsung and TSMC, the chips will be built on 14/16nm process technology, which means they should be even more energy-efficient and powerful than their predecessor. Sources said that Apple’s original plan was to use 20nm chips in the iPhone 6c, but FinFET processor architecture would enable a “specs upgrade and lower power consumption.”
The drawback seems to be that Apple won’t launch the 4-inch iPhone 6c until some point in the second-quarter of 2016, a rather unusual release window for new iPhones. The tech site doesn’t actually explain why Apple would delay the iPhone 6c launch, but it would mean that Apple has not two but three redesigned iPhones in store for us in 2016.
Digitimes also says that TSMC and Samsung have already started mass-producing iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus chips, which should be built on 14/16nm FinFET tech as well.


iPhone 6s leak shows new design is thicker than the iPhone 6

iPhone 6s leak shows new design is thicker than the iPhone 6
With September just around the corner, the number of iPhone 6s component leaks have started picking up. Just this past weekend, photos purporting to showcase iPhone 6s display components leaked online. Originally spotted by Nowhereelse, the components appear to be just slightly different from corresponding iPhone 6 components.  So while the photos in and of themselves don’t provide any insight regarding the Force Touch feature Apple is reportedly incorporating into the next-gen iPhone, previous reports have indicated that Apple’s supply partners have already started manufacturing Force Touch displays.
Even more interesting is a leak which purports to showcase an iPhone 6s prototype out in the wild. Originally published by M.I.C gadget, the photos were allegedly taken by “old” workers from Foxconn. As expected, the iPhone 6s design is aesthetically similar to the iPhone 6, hardly surprising given that Apple’s ‘s’ upgrades have historically maintained the same exact design as the previous model.
What is interesting, though, is that the iPhone 6s device obtained by M.I.C gadget appears to be just slightly thicker than the iPhone 6. While Apple has a penchant for making each successive iPhone thinner than its predecessor, the iPhone 6s prototype pictured here is reportedly 7.1 mm thick, just a tad thicker than the 6.9 mm iPhone 6. More than likely, the added thickness comes from sensors associated with the Force Touch display Apple will reportedly be bringing to the iPhone.
iphone 6s prototype
Over the past few months we’ve seen a few reports indicating that Apple plans to position Force Touch as a key selling point for the iPhone 6s and 6s Plus. While Apple has already included the feature on both the Apple Watch and the revamped MacBook, it remains to be seen what type of interface interactions Apple plans to associate with Force Touch on the iPhone. If it is, in fact, a highly touted iPhone feature, it stands to reason that Apple will have some cool tricks to show us come September.

As for other iPhone 6s features to look forward to, we can expect to see 2GB of RAM, a 12 megapixel camera, a speedy A9 processor, a more durable aluminum body, and an improved Touch ID Sensor.

Shutdown Showdown Over Planned Parenthood Possible, Members of Congress Say

Shutdown Showdown Over Planned Parenthood Possible, Members of Congress Say

GTY_planned_parenthood_rally_jt_150731_16x9_992
Could a debate over Planned Parenthood funding shut down the government? According to conservative Republicans in Congress, the answer is yes.
Many have been warning that they will hold up measures to fund the government past October if the legislation contains any taxpayer dollars for Planned Parenthood, which became the center of debate again after videos surfaced allegedly showing employees of the group discussing prices for fetal tissue and body parts.
“We can not and will not support any funding resolution ... that contains any funding for Planned Parenthood, including mandatory funding streams,” wrote 18 Republican House members to House leadership Wednesday.
This would present a major hurdle for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who has repeatedly pledged that the government would not shut down under GOP congressional stewardship.
“We're certainly not going to shut down the government or default on the national debt," he said during a March television interview.
More moderate Republicans and some centrist Democrats are already working on ways to avoid ending taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood outright, but focus instead on removing just funding that goes to clinics that engage in fetal-tissue procurement. Moderate Maine Republican Susan Collins is working on legislation that would maintain Title X and Medicaid funding for all Planned Parenthood clinics that do not engage in fetal tissue sales. National Journal noted that Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of

West Virginia is working with her, but that Senate Republican leadership has not yet approved the legislation.
"We need more facts and a more targeted approach," Collins said in a statement.
Whether a compromise is reached or not, the issue is already becoming a fight for which Democrats, who largely support federal funding to Planned Parenthood, are steeling themselves.
“This is just presidential Republican primary politics finding their way onto the Senate floor,” Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Connecticut, said today. 

Photographer Searches for Owner of Stunning Vintage Photos Found at a Thrift Shop

Photographer Searches for Owner of Stunning Vintage Photos Found at a Thrift Shop

HT_meagan_abell_vintage_photos_4_jt_150731_16x9_992
It’s no secret that you can find hidden gems in thrift shops.
Meagan Abell, 24, was searching through boxes of vintage photographs when she found four transparency strips in a Richmond, Virginia, thrift shop and now she’s using social media to unravel the mystery behind them.
“My initial thought was that I want to know the story behind them,” she told ABC News today. “What was the idea of having [the model] walk into the ocean fully clothed? What was the concept? As a photographer, I always think it’s important to give credit where it’s due.”
She posted the photos to Facebook on Wednesday with the hopes of finding the photographer or anyone with knowledge about the 15 photographs she discovered on June 11. She asked people to spread the word with #FindTheGirlsOnTheNegatives.
The photos were shared more than 8,000 times in less than 24 hours, ABC affiliate WRIC reported.
“I talked to the thrift shop owner and he had no clue where the vendor got them, so I struck out there,” she said.
Abell now believes the 1950s-style shots were taken on the California coast for a magazine or portfolio shoot, thanks to advice from a veteran photographer.
“You never see a full facial portrait of the women and the lighting is very soft and moody. Not having a name or face for either woman makes it haunting,” Abell said.
“People have been having a lot of fun with coming up with interesting theories about the back story to the photos,” she added.
The only markings on the four sets of photo strips are a series of numbers -- 431 6082 -- that run along the edge. Abell initially thought the photos were negatives, however, she later learned they’re called transparencies because they are full color.
“I especially want to find the owner because they are just so stunning,” she said. “I want to make sure people know who created these pictures.”

Zoe Saldana Shares Photo of Flat Post-Baby Abs—to Mixed Reviews

Zoe Saldana Shares Photo of Flat Post-Baby Abs—to Mixed Reviews

zoe-saldana-abs-MAIN
There’s no denying that celebrity moms are pressured to get back to their thin frames almost immediately after they give birth. From Kim Kardashian to Kelly Clarkson, moms in the spotlight are under immense media scrutiny regarding the weight they gained while creating a human being or—gasp—the possibility that they might not lose it all in a matter days.
Actor Zoe Saldana admitted that she too felt the pressure to get back to her slender stature after giving birth to twin boys. From the looks of her latest gym selfie, she’s been successful. Saldana’s rolled-up shirt reveals a toned tummy, just eight months after her sons were born.
“Almost there! It's been difficult but so rewarding,” Saldana captioned the photo. “I feel strong. All it takes is determination! Mommies we can all do it, damn it!!!”
The image has received upwards of 45,000 likes and hundreds of shares and comments since she posted it on Wednesday. Many commenters rooted Saldana on, noting that they felt inspired to hit the gym and less alone in their fitness journeys. But not everyone was a fan of the actor’s implication that achieving such a shape was possible.
“Not everyone is affluent enough not to have to work hard jobs and get babysitters,” wrote Facebook user Laurie Mcculloh. Saldana credits some of her success to work she’s done with her trainer, a luxury many women can’t afford. 
Others noted that Saldana was naturally svelte before her pregnancy. “That's not realistic for most women after we have kids,” wrote Melissa Rutkowske‪. It’s not realistic for women before they have kids, either, as the average American women wears a size 14.
Others felt that the picture referred to Saldana’s journey and a common struggle many women can relate to after giving birth. The Guardians of the Galaxy actor stated that she hit 185 pounds during her pregnancy and struggled to find the energy to shed the 70 pounds she gained while carrying her boys. In recent social media posts, Saldana detailed her battle to get to the gym by sharing a photo of herself on the treadmill and saying that “bouncing back felt impossible.”
As moms began to compare their size with Saldana’s, some users pointed out that her message didn’t necessarily mean that all moms could become as thin as her or return to their pre-baby body. Instead, the actor’s message inspired them to prioritize self-care and work toward the size that makes them feel the most comfortable.
“You don’t have to look like her,” wrote Whitney B. “It’s [about] looking YOUR best.”

I used to be obsessed with SoulCycle — until I realized how much is wrong with the class

I used to be obsessed with SoulCycle — until I realized how much is wrong with the class


.com/en_us/Finance/US_AFTP_SILICONALLEY_H_LIVE/
(REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton) The wheels of an indoor bicycle seen at a SoulCycle class at the company's Union Square location in New York on April 13, 2011.

SoulCycle — an expensive fitness studio popular among urban women — filed to go public on Thursday.
This verifies that the boutique indoor cycling classes are, in fact, taking over America.
But as with many fitness fads, it's not all it's cracked up to be.
I can confirm this firsthand.
I had a momentary obsession with SoulCycle. Stuck in a fitness rut and feeling the effects of my desk job on my waistline, I wanted a workout that would force me to break a sweat.
A shiny new, grapefruit-smelling SoulCycle studio had opened close to my neighborhood, and as an avid spinner, I found that sometimes regular spin classes left me unsweaty and unsatisfied. I had tried high-intensity interval videos on YouTube in my living room, much to the chagrin of my neighbors, and that didn't work, either. The idea of a class was alluring; I would be required to show up, and at $34 a class, I would have to push myself, or else it wouldn't be worth it.
Plus, I had heard so much about the community of SoulCycle. Celebrities cycled there. Reportedly, the teachers were like gurus, and you would leave with your metaphorical demons cast out from your day!
But I was nervous, because in November I had passed my certification to be a Mad Dogg spinning instructor, and Mad Dogg master instructors vilify SoulCycle. I felt slightly like a traitor, but I was still excited about the new experience. Plus, a first class was a comparatively cheaper $20, and the new studio near my apartment even offered a one-time complimentary class. I promised myself I would go only those two times, but that turned into many, many more.
But then I realized there are many things wrong with SoulCycle. My wallet is now thanking me.

1. It's not a good workout, according to some experts.

View gallery
.
.com/en_us/Finance/US_AFTP_SILICONALLEY_H_LIVE/
(Getty/Michael Buckner)
Because SoulCycle focuses on combining dance moves (that have not been scientifically proved to do anything for you) with riding the bike, I found it hard to actually get an optimal cardiovascular workout and a toning workout.
In 2011, James S. Fell wrote in the Los Angeles Times that he gave SoulCycle "a failing grade for exercise physiology and biomechanics."
"The whole idea of working one's upper body while pedaling a stationary bike is not only counterproductive," he wrote, "it can be physically detrimental over time, according to several experts I talked to."
He wrote that neither of SoulCycle's cofounders, Julie Rice and Elizabeth Cutler, had a background in exercise science or any indoor cycling certifications. (Rice told Fell the two worked with an exercise physiologist to come up with the routines.)
Further, some experts believe that the workout is bunk and that by combining weights and cycling, you actually lose efficiency, one expert told Fell.
"You're probably going to burn less calories because your power output is going to drop," Jennifer Sage, a master-spinning instructor with a degree in exercise science who wrote the emphatic "I'd Rather Sell My Soul Than SoulCycle," told Fell.
Separately, Sage wrote that the popular move of doing push-ups on the bike was useless. "Because of this vigorous action, there is momentum to his movement, reducing even more the potential of any strength gain," she wrote.
"There is an illusion that they are working out harder because high repetitions can cause a burning sensation, but it doesn't accomplish anything," Martha Heaner, an indoor cycling instructor with over 15 year of experience who has a doctorate degree in nutrition and physical activity, told Fell in the same Los Angeles Times article. 

2. You can hurt yourself.

View gallery
.
.com/en_us/Finance/US_AFTP_SILICONALLEY_H_LIVE/
(Courtesy of SoulCycle)
When I got certified to teach spin, one of the most important things I learned was that proper alignment is crucial to avoiding back injuries. While some SoulCycle instructors do make concerted efforts to go around and help participants find proper form before the class begins, others didn't do that in some of the classes I took.
That leaves room for injuries — and in an already intimidating (and at times, snobby) environment, it can be tough to ask for help, let alone grab the attention of your instructor or one of the attendants.
There's also more of an effort on "following the dance moves" than following the instructor. (You can see a hilarious Gawker review of the class in which Rich Juzwiak, Caity Weaver, and Leah Beckmann attempt to follow along to prove just how confusing these dance moves can be.)
But this shouldn't come as too much of a surprise, as SoulCycle openly discloses that most of its instructors, as is the case with its founders, do not have fitness backgrounds. "SoulCycle is open about the fact that the company recruits performers as much as, if not more than, people with a fitness background," New York Magazine reported in 2013.
Master trainer Janet Fitzgerald confirmed to the magazine that she "would rather not take an outdoor triathlete" as opposed to a dancer or SoulCycle enthusiast. This alone is yet another problem with the fitness regimen.
Even when doing the exercise routine properly, there are plenty of opportunities to injure yourself. Sage told the Los Angeles Times that "when you start bobbing and weaving and doing push-ups on a bike while your legs are spinning, you risk hurting your low back." In that same article, other fitness experts disapproved of not only the validity, but the safety of the workout.
Sage has specifically criticized the popular "tap-back" move for its ability to cause injuries — it's what spin instructors call a "contraindicated move." "They are about as contraindicated as one can get because of the deceleration required by the back muscles," she wrote. "Otherwise you'd slam down hard into the saddle. There is zero benefit to doing these, and they are potentially harmful to joints and the musculature of the back."
Additionally, riding with little to no resistance can result in injuries. In a separate post detailing an unsafe spin class, Sage wrote, "by not having resistance, rider's hips and spine are unsupported at such a high cadence, potentially injuring the low back." Of course, riding in any spin class with little resistance could lead to injuries like this. 

3. SoulCycle fools you into thinking you're working harder than you actually are.

View gallery
.
.com/en_us/Finance/US_AFTP_SILICONALLEY_H_LIVE/
(REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton)
If you've ever walked out of a SoulCycle class drenched in sweat, it's probably because the studios don't cool the rooms down; it's warm in there. The rooms are notoriously steamy. The first time I experienced this, I foolishly attributed my soaked attire to an intense workout. I must have burned a billion calories!
Not quite. Many people buy into the fact that they're eviscerating calories from their bodies, but it's just part of SoulCycle's pseudo-yogi schtick.

4. SoulCycle charges you for water and shoes.

SoulCycle requires riders to don shoes that are able to clip on to the pedals, which isn't unusual for an indoor cycling class. It's $3, however, to rent shoes previously worn by someone else. Additionally, Smart Water is $2. 
Purchasing bottled water isn't a unique experience at an upscale fitness studio, but it does seem a bit excessive when you learn that SoulCycle's biggest competitor, Flywheel, grants you water and shoe rentals free.
These expenses add up on top of the already-steep fees. 

5. You get shoved to the back, where you may not be able to see the instructor.

View gallery
.
.com/en_us/Finance/US_AFTP_SILICONALLEY_H_LIVE/
(Netflix)
If you've watched "Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt," you've seen an excellent parody of this phenomenon, with Nick Kroll as a hack spinning instructor.
New riders are encouraged to stay away from the front, which can make following the instructor near to impossible. (Usually, the rear end of a fellow rider is in your face instead.) As mentioned previously, it's problematic to not be able to follow along with the instructor.
This practice also gives the experience a cliquey feel. You have to work your way to be good enough for the front row — and by good enough, it doesn't mean in shape enough. It means that you've mastered the "dance" moves on the bike. This is plausibly another strategy to get people to keep coming back; riders want to get coordinated enough to get bumped up to the front. I made it to the front once ... but it was a day when the front row was empty.

6. It's expensive, and there aren't memberships available for loyal, frequent riders.

View gallery
.
.com/en_us/Finance/US_AFTP_SILICONALLEY_H_LIVE/
(Courtesy of SoulCycle)
It's a no-brainer that SoulCycle is a very easy way to throw your money into the wind, but the cost is even harder to take when you realize other cycling studios offer memberships — or participate in ClassPass, a hot startup that despite its demerits, allows fitness enthusiasts to sample many boutique fitness studios for what was a cool $99 a month (it's now $125 a month in New York, after a recent price hike). 
SoulCycle's top competitor, FlyWheel, offers memberships at specific studios in New York City for $375 a month. That is expensive, but classes are unlimited; it's a deal if you go every single day. In other cities, FlyWheel memberships are even cheaper. SoulCycle offers no such options. Classes are available to purchase as singles or by the package, which reduces the price tag per class only slightly. A SuperSoul package exists for $3,500; it's 50 classes, and it goes so far to hike up the prices to 70 classes, with the "benefit" of securing the ability to register for coveted classes earlier and a concierge service.
And a new spin studio with significantly more affordable prices, CycleBar, has been opening up franchises like crazy across America.
Even Equinox, which is often criticized for its sky-high price, seems affordable in comparison with SoulCycle.

7. It owns its elitism and exclusivity.

By not joining ClassPass and by not offering memberships, SoulCycle owns the fact that it is for the upper echelon of society. So it's no surprise that going to SoulCycle feels more like going to a debutante ball than going to the gym. 
It's also hard to get into SoulCycle classes; sign-ups are at noon on Mondays, and unsurprisingly, the popular classes fill up rapidly, leaving many die-hard riders without their preferred classes. "The withholding creates that rare thing among the well-heeled — unfulfilled material desire," Vanessa Grigoriadis wrote in Vanity Fair in 2012. 
This supposedly community-based workout thrives on keeping people out.

8. It doesn't make you feel good about yourself, but it promises that it will.

A photo posted by SoulCycle (@soulcycle) on Jul 9, 2015 at 1:15pm PDT on Jul 9, 2015 at 1:15pm PDT
While this may not be true for all of the clientele, there's something about being shoved to the back of a room amid a sea of perfectly sculpted and tanned women with massive diamond rings, clad in SoulCycle's signature apparel, that doesn't make you feel great. Yet SoulCycle's marketing promises to help you be the best you, if you keep coming back (and buying the company's very expensive apparel with the word "SoulCycle" stamped across it!)
On its website, SoulCycle makes some lofty promises about how it will alter riders' universes: "forty-five minutes is all it takes to transform the way you look and feel," and more grandiose, "SoulCycle doesn't just change bodies, it changes lives." 

9. The wording in its IPO filing was ludicrous.

You can click here to read it, but be warned that it contains the words "tribal" and "primal."
That said, there are undeniably a few good things about SoulCycle. Some instructors really do say the right platitudes that keep you coming back (I know I have a few favorites still whom I would ride with again on occasion). Some instructors also offer classes that are structured more like traditional interval classes, and they shy away from the distracting dancing hi-jinks — but you have to go through many classes and instructors (and paychecks) to get there. And at the end of the day, anything that gets people off of the couch and exercising can't be entirely lambasted. 
We reached out to SoulCycle, and the company declined to comment, citing the quiet period before filing for an initial public offering.









 Original post found on
 http://news.yahoo.com/used-obsessed-soulcycle-until-realized-143746908.html

Hoping To Have Big Family? You Should Start Trying For A Baby Aged 23

Hoping To Have Big Family? You Should Start Trying For A Baby Aged 23

tumblr_inline_nscekw8tyM1tslwzc_1280
Scientists are hoping a new fertility calculator will prompt women to have children earlier. [Photo: Rex]
Another day, another scientific report about how we’ve all left it too late to have children – or at least more than one, anyway.
New advice suggests that women who’re hoping to have a big family should start trying for their first child at the age of 23 – before most of us even have got our careers on track or found someone serious to get pregnant with.
Scientists looked at fertility data from almost 60,000 women to create an at-a-glance calculator that advises ladies on when you should pregnant. In an ideal world, obviously.
The computer model, published by New Scientist, gives couples an idea of when to start trying for a baby, depending on how many children they would like to have.
Basically, if you’re over the age of 23 and hoping to have more than two kids then you may have a tough time conceiving all three naturally. 
.
tumblr_inline_nsceleTKkS1tslwzc_1280
As a woman ages, her ferility chances decreases making it harder to conceive naturally. [Photo: Rex]
A woman’s chances are measured in percentages, showing that a 23-year-old woman has a 90 per cent chance of having three children without IVF. At the age of 31, this figure declines to 75 per cent and aged 35 things look even bleaker, with just a 50 per cent of getting pregnant three times naturally.
If you’re happy with just two children, things look slightly better. According to the calculator, you can wait until you’re 27 to start your family and still have a 90 per cent chance of conceiving naturally. At 34 years old, you’ll still be in with a 75 per cent and aged 38 you’ll have 50 per cent chance of getting pregnant without IVF intervention.
Those hoping for one child have the best odds, unsurprisingly. A 32-year-old woman has a 90 per cent chance of conceiving without IVF, a 37-year-old has a 75 per cent chance and a 41-year-old woman is 50 per cent likely to have a baby naturally.
.
tumblr_inline_nscesjxk5Y1tslwzc_1280
Easier said than done! [Photo: New Scientist]
The chart also shows how IVF can increase a woman’s chance of getting pregnant – but of course there are a number of risks and side effects that come with IVF, such as ectopic birth, multiple births and Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, a rare complication associated with IVF.
Fertility experts reckon the table should be shown to sixth formers and uni students so that they’re aware of the risks of putting their career first.
“We haven’t got a time machine we can put people in… that’s just a blunt reality,” says professor Allan Pacey, a Sheffield University fertility expert.
“Everyone thinks you can wait – this shows you can’t.”
Copyright © 2015