Apple will reportedly launch 3 brand new iPhones next year, and the first could launch soon

Apple will reportedly launch 3 brand new iPhones next year, and the first could launch soon
iphone-6c-1
Earlier this year, rumors claimed that Apple would have three new iPhone versions in stores in 2015, but subsequent reports disputed those claims. Some argued that Apple had canceled the smallest model in its iPhone 6s family – thus far referred to as the iPhone 6c – while others said the phone might still be on track for release at a later point.

Now, a new report says that Apple is still making the handset, though the new 4-inch iPhone won’t launch until next year.
According to chatter from the semiconductor industry, Apple is looking to equip the iPhone 5c successor with FinFET chips, Digitimes says.
Mass-produced by Samsung and TSMC, the chips will be built on 14/16nm process technology, which means they should be even more energy-efficient and powerful than their predecessor. Sources said that Apple’s original plan was to use 20nm chips in the iPhone 6c, but FinFET processor architecture would enable a “specs upgrade and lower power consumption.”
The drawback seems to be that Apple won’t launch the 4-inch iPhone 6c until some point in the second-quarter of 2016, a rather unusual release window for new iPhones. The tech site doesn’t actually explain why Apple would delay the iPhone 6c launch, but it would mean that Apple has not two but three redesigned iPhones in store for us in 2016.
Digitimes also says that TSMC and Samsung have already started mass-producing iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus chips, which should be built on 14/16nm FinFET tech as well.


iPhone 6s leak shows new design is thicker than the iPhone 6

iPhone 6s leak shows new design is thicker than the iPhone 6
With September just around the corner, the number of iPhone 6s component leaks have started picking up. Just this past weekend, photos purporting to showcase iPhone 6s display components leaked online. Originally spotted by Nowhereelse, the components appear to be just slightly different from corresponding iPhone 6 components.  So while the photos in and of themselves don’t provide any insight regarding the Force Touch feature Apple is reportedly incorporating into the next-gen iPhone, previous reports have indicated that Apple’s supply partners have already started manufacturing Force Touch displays.
Even more interesting is a leak which purports to showcase an iPhone 6s prototype out in the wild. Originally published by M.I.C gadget, the photos were allegedly taken by “old” workers from Foxconn. As expected, the iPhone 6s design is aesthetically similar to the iPhone 6, hardly surprising given that Apple’s ‘s’ upgrades have historically maintained the same exact design as the previous model.
What is interesting, though, is that the iPhone 6s device obtained by M.I.C gadget appears to be just slightly thicker than the iPhone 6. While Apple has a penchant for making each successive iPhone thinner than its predecessor, the iPhone 6s prototype pictured here is reportedly 7.1 mm thick, just a tad thicker than the 6.9 mm iPhone 6. More than likely, the added thickness comes from sensors associated with the Force Touch display Apple will reportedly be bringing to the iPhone.
iphone 6s prototype
Over the past few months we’ve seen a few reports indicating that Apple plans to position Force Touch as a key selling point for the iPhone 6s and 6s Plus. While Apple has already included the feature on both the Apple Watch and the revamped MacBook, it remains to be seen what type of interface interactions Apple plans to associate with Force Touch on the iPhone. If it is, in fact, a highly touted iPhone feature, it stands to reason that Apple will have some cool tricks to show us come September.

As for other iPhone 6s features to look forward to, we can expect to see 2GB of RAM, a 12 megapixel camera, a speedy A9 processor, a more durable aluminum body, and an improved Touch ID Sensor.

Shutdown Showdown Over Planned Parenthood Possible, Members of Congress Say

Shutdown Showdown Over Planned Parenthood Possible, Members of Congress Say

GTY_planned_parenthood_rally_jt_150731_16x9_992
Could a debate over Planned Parenthood funding shut down the government? According to conservative Republicans in Congress, the answer is yes.
Many have been warning that they will hold up measures to fund the government past October if the legislation contains any taxpayer dollars for Planned Parenthood, which became the center of debate again after videos surfaced allegedly showing employees of the group discussing prices for fetal tissue and body parts.
“We can not and will not support any funding resolution ... that contains any funding for Planned Parenthood, including mandatory funding streams,” wrote 18 Republican House members to House leadership Wednesday.
This would present a major hurdle for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who has repeatedly pledged that the government would not shut down under GOP congressional stewardship.
“We're certainly not going to shut down the government or default on the national debt," he said during a March television interview.
More moderate Republicans and some centrist Democrats are already working on ways to avoid ending taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood outright, but focus instead on removing just funding that goes to clinics that engage in fetal-tissue procurement. Moderate Maine Republican Susan Collins is working on legislation that would maintain Title X and Medicaid funding for all Planned Parenthood clinics that do not engage in fetal tissue sales. National Journal noted that Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of

West Virginia is working with her, but that Senate Republican leadership has not yet approved the legislation.
"We need more facts and a more targeted approach," Collins said in a statement.
Whether a compromise is reached or not, the issue is already becoming a fight for which Democrats, who largely support federal funding to Planned Parenthood, are steeling themselves.
“This is just presidential Republican primary politics finding their way onto the Senate floor,” Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Connecticut, said today. 

Photographer Searches for Owner of Stunning Vintage Photos Found at a Thrift Shop

Photographer Searches for Owner of Stunning Vintage Photos Found at a Thrift Shop

HT_meagan_abell_vintage_photos_4_jt_150731_16x9_992
It’s no secret that you can find hidden gems in thrift shops.
Meagan Abell, 24, was searching through boxes of vintage photographs when she found four transparency strips in a Richmond, Virginia, thrift shop and now she’s using social media to unravel the mystery behind them.
“My initial thought was that I want to know the story behind them,” she told ABC News today. “What was the idea of having [the model] walk into the ocean fully clothed? What was the concept? As a photographer, I always think it’s important to give credit where it’s due.”
She posted the photos to Facebook on Wednesday with the hopes of finding the photographer or anyone with knowledge about the 15 photographs she discovered on June 11. She asked people to spread the word with #FindTheGirlsOnTheNegatives.
The photos were shared more than 8,000 times in less than 24 hours, ABC affiliate WRIC reported.
“I talked to the thrift shop owner and he had no clue where the vendor got them, so I struck out there,” she said.
Abell now believes the 1950s-style shots were taken on the California coast for a magazine or portfolio shoot, thanks to advice from a veteran photographer.
“You never see a full facial portrait of the women and the lighting is very soft and moody. Not having a name or face for either woman makes it haunting,” Abell said.
“People have been having a lot of fun with coming up with interesting theories about the back story to the photos,” she added.
The only markings on the four sets of photo strips are a series of numbers -- 431 6082 -- that run along the edge. Abell initially thought the photos were negatives, however, she later learned they’re called transparencies because they are full color.
“I especially want to find the owner because they are just so stunning,” she said. “I want to make sure people know who created these pictures.”

Zoe Saldana Shares Photo of Flat Post-Baby Abs—to Mixed Reviews

Zoe Saldana Shares Photo of Flat Post-Baby Abs—to Mixed Reviews

zoe-saldana-abs-MAIN
There’s no denying that celebrity moms are pressured to get back to their thin frames almost immediately after they give birth. From Kim Kardashian to Kelly Clarkson, moms in the spotlight are under immense media scrutiny regarding the weight they gained while creating a human being or—gasp—the possibility that they might not lose it all in a matter days.
Actor Zoe Saldana admitted that she too felt the pressure to get back to her slender stature after giving birth to twin boys. From the looks of her latest gym selfie, she’s been successful. Saldana’s rolled-up shirt reveals a toned tummy, just eight months after her sons were born.
“Almost there! It's been difficult but so rewarding,” Saldana captioned the photo. “I feel strong. All it takes is determination! Mommies we can all do it, damn it!!!”
The image has received upwards of 45,000 likes and hundreds of shares and comments since she posted it on Wednesday. Many commenters rooted Saldana on, noting that they felt inspired to hit the gym and less alone in their fitness journeys. But not everyone was a fan of the actor’s implication that achieving such a shape was possible.
“Not everyone is affluent enough not to have to work hard jobs and get babysitters,” wrote Facebook user Laurie Mcculloh. Saldana credits some of her success to work she’s done with her trainer, a luxury many women can’t afford. 
Others noted that Saldana was naturally svelte before her pregnancy. “That's not realistic for most women after we have kids,” wrote Melissa Rutkowske‪. It’s not realistic for women before they have kids, either, as the average American women wears a size 14.
Others felt that the picture referred to Saldana’s journey and a common struggle many women can relate to after giving birth. The Guardians of the Galaxy actor stated that she hit 185 pounds during her pregnancy and struggled to find the energy to shed the 70 pounds she gained while carrying her boys. In recent social media posts, Saldana detailed her battle to get to the gym by sharing a photo of herself on the treadmill and saying that “bouncing back felt impossible.”
As moms began to compare their size with Saldana’s, some users pointed out that her message didn’t necessarily mean that all moms could become as thin as her or return to their pre-baby body. Instead, the actor’s message inspired them to prioritize self-care and work toward the size that makes them feel the most comfortable.
“You don’t have to look like her,” wrote Whitney B. “It’s [about] looking YOUR best.”

I used to be obsessed with SoulCycle — until I realized how much is wrong with the class

I used to be obsessed with SoulCycle — until I realized how much is wrong with the class


.com/en_us/Finance/US_AFTP_SILICONALLEY_H_LIVE/
(REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton) The wheels of an indoor bicycle seen at a SoulCycle class at the company's Union Square location in New York on April 13, 2011.

SoulCycle — an expensive fitness studio popular among urban women — filed to go public on Thursday.
This verifies that the boutique indoor cycling classes are, in fact, taking over America.
But as with many fitness fads, it's not all it's cracked up to be.
I can confirm this firsthand.
I had a momentary obsession with SoulCycle. Stuck in a fitness rut and feeling the effects of my desk job on my waistline, I wanted a workout that would force me to break a sweat.
A shiny new, grapefruit-smelling SoulCycle studio had opened close to my neighborhood, and as an avid spinner, I found that sometimes regular spin classes left me unsweaty and unsatisfied. I had tried high-intensity interval videos on YouTube in my living room, much to the chagrin of my neighbors, and that didn't work, either. The idea of a class was alluring; I would be required to show up, and at $34 a class, I would have to push myself, or else it wouldn't be worth it.
Plus, I had heard so much about the community of SoulCycle. Celebrities cycled there. Reportedly, the teachers were like gurus, and you would leave with your metaphorical demons cast out from your day!
But I was nervous, because in November I had passed my certification to be a Mad Dogg spinning instructor, and Mad Dogg master instructors vilify SoulCycle. I felt slightly like a traitor, but I was still excited about the new experience. Plus, a first class was a comparatively cheaper $20, and the new studio near my apartment even offered a one-time complimentary class. I promised myself I would go only those two times, but that turned into many, many more.
But then I realized there are many things wrong with SoulCycle. My wallet is now thanking me.

1. It's not a good workout, according to some experts.

View gallery
.
.com/en_us/Finance/US_AFTP_SILICONALLEY_H_LIVE/
(Getty/Michael Buckner)
Because SoulCycle focuses on combining dance moves (that have not been scientifically proved to do anything for you) with riding the bike, I found it hard to actually get an optimal cardiovascular workout and a toning workout.
In 2011, James S. Fell wrote in the Los Angeles Times that he gave SoulCycle "a failing grade for exercise physiology and biomechanics."
"The whole idea of working one's upper body while pedaling a stationary bike is not only counterproductive," he wrote, "it can be physically detrimental over time, according to several experts I talked to."
He wrote that neither of SoulCycle's cofounders, Julie Rice and Elizabeth Cutler, had a background in exercise science or any indoor cycling certifications. (Rice told Fell the two worked with an exercise physiologist to come up with the routines.)
Further, some experts believe that the workout is bunk and that by combining weights and cycling, you actually lose efficiency, one expert told Fell.
"You're probably going to burn less calories because your power output is going to drop," Jennifer Sage, a master-spinning instructor with a degree in exercise science who wrote the emphatic "I'd Rather Sell My Soul Than SoulCycle," told Fell.
Separately, Sage wrote that the popular move of doing push-ups on the bike was useless. "Because of this vigorous action, there is momentum to his movement, reducing even more the potential of any strength gain," she wrote.
"There is an illusion that they are working out harder because high repetitions can cause a burning sensation, but it doesn't accomplish anything," Martha Heaner, an indoor cycling instructor with over 15 year of experience who has a doctorate degree in nutrition and physical activity, told Fell in the same Los Angeles Times article. 

2. You can hurt yourself.

View gallery
.
.com/en_us/Finance/US_AFTP_SILICONALLEY_H_LIVE/
(Courtesy of SoulCycle)
When I got certified to teach spin, one of the most important things I learned was that proper alignment is crucial to avoiding back injuries. While some SoulCycle instructors do make concerted efforts to go around and help participants find proper form before the class begins, others didn't do that in some of the classes I took.
That leaves room for injuries — and in an already intimidating (and at times, snobby) environment, it can be tough to ask for help, let alone grab the attention of your instructor or one of the attendants.
There's also more of an effort on "following the dance moves" than following the instructor. (You can see a hilarious Gawker review of the class in which Rich Juzwiak, Caity Weaver, and Leah Beckmann attempt to follow along to prove just how confusing these dance moves can be.)
But this shouldn't come as too much of a surprise, as SoulCycle openly discloses that most of its instructors, as is the case with its founders, do not have fitness backgrounds. "SoulCycle is open about the fact that the company recruits performers as much as, if not more than, people with a fitness background," New York Magazine reported in 2013.
Master trainer Janet Fitzgerald confirmed to the magazine that she "would rather not take an outdoor triathlete" as opposed to a dancer or SoulCycle enthusiast. This alone is yet another problem with the fitness regimen.
Even when doing the exercise routine properly, there are plenty of opportunities to injure yourself. Sage told the Los Angeles Times that "when you start bobbing and weaving and doing push-ups on a bike while your legs are spinning, you risk hurting your low back." In that same article, other fitness experts disapproved of not only the validity, but the safety of the workout.
Sage has specifically criticized the popular "tap-back" move for its ability to cause injuries — it's what spin instructors call a "contraindicated move." "They are about as contraindicated as one can get because of the deceleration required by the back muscles," she wrote. "Otherwise you'd slam down hard into the saddle. There is zero benefit to doing these, and they are potentially harmful to joints and the musculature of the back."
Additionally, riding with little to no resistance can result in injuries. In a separate post detailing an unsafe spin class, Sage wrote, "by not having resistance, rider's hips and spine are unsupported at such a high cadence, potentially injuring the low back." Of course, riding in any spin class with little resistance could lead to injuries like this. 

3. SoulCycle fools you into thinking you're working harder than you actually are.

View gallery
.
.com/en_us/Finance/US_AFTP_SILICONALLEY_H_LIVE/
(REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton)
If you've ever walked out of a SoulCycle class drenched in sweat, it's probably because the studios don't cool the rooms down; it's warm in there. The rooms are notoriously steamy. The first time I experienced this, I foolishly attributed my soaked attire to an intense workout. I must have burned a billion calories!
Not quite. Many people buy into the fact that they're eviscerating calories from their bodies, but it's just part of SoulCycle's pseudo-yogi schtick.

4. SoulCycle charges you for water and shoes.

SoulCycle requires riders to don shoes that are able to clip on to the pedals, which isn't unusual for an indoor cycling class. It's $3, however, to rent shoes previously worn by someone else. Additionally, Smart Water is $2. 
Purchasing bottled water isn't a unique experience at an upscale fitness studio, but it does seem a bit excessive when you learn that SoulCycle's biggest competitor, Flywheel, grants you water and shoe rentals free.
These expenses add up on top of the already-steep fees. 

5. You get shoved to the back, where you may not be able to see the instructor.

View gallery
.
.com/en_us/Finance/US_AFTP_SILICONALLEY_H_LIVE/
(Netflix)
If you've watched "Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt," you've seen an excellent parody of this phenomenon, with Nick Kroll as a hack spinning instructor.
New riders are encouraged to stay away from the front, which can make following the instructor near to impossible. (Usually, the rear end of a fellow rider is in your face instead.) As mentioned previously, it's problematic to not be able to follow along with the instructor.
This practice also gives the experience a cliquey feel. You have to work your way to be good enough for the front row — and by good enough, it doesn't mean in shape enough. It means that you've mastered the "dance" moves on the bike. This is plausibly another strategy to get people to keep coming back; riders want to get coordinated enough to get bumped up to the front. I made it to the front once ... but it was a day when the front row was empty.

6. It's expensive, and there aren't memberships available for loyal, frequent riders.

View gallery
.
.com/en_us/Finance/US_AFTP_SILICONALLEY_H_LIVE/
(Courtesy of SoulCycle)
It's a no-brainer that SoulCycle is a very easy way to throw your money into the wind, but the cost is even harder to take when you realize other cycling studios offer memberships — or participate in ClassPass, a hot startup that despite its demerits, allows fitness enthusiasts to sample many boutique fitness studios for what was a cool $99 a month (it's now $125 a month in New York, after a recent price hike). 
SoulCycle's top competitor, FlyWheel, offers memberships at specific studios in New York City for $375 a month. That is expensive, but classes are unlimited; it's a deal if you go every single day. In other cities, FlyWheel memberships are even cheaper. SoulCycle offers no such options. Classes are available to purchase as singles or by the package, which reduces the price tag per class only slightly. A SuperSoul package exists for $3,500; it's 50 classes, and it goes so far to hike up the prices to 70 classes, with the "benefit" of securing the ability to register for coveted classes earlier and a concierge service.
And a new spin studio with significantly more affordable prices, CycleBar, has been opening up franchises like crazy across America.
Even Equinox, which is often criticized for its sky-high price, seems affordable in comparison with SoulCycle.

7. It owns its elitism and exclusivity.

By not joining ClassPass and by not offering memberships, SoulCycle owns the fact that it is for the upper echelon of society. So it's no surprise that going to SoulCycle feels more like going to a debutante ball than going to the gym. 
It's also hard to get into SoulCycle classes; sign-ups are at noon on Mondays, and unsurprisingly, the popular classes fill up rapidly, leaving many die-hard riders without their preferred classes. "The withholding creates that rare thing among the well-heeled — unfulfilled material desire," Vanessa Grigoriadis wrote in Vanity Fair in 2012. 
This supposedly community-based workout thrives on keeping people out.

8. It doesn't make you feel good about yourself, but it promises that it will.

A photo posted by SoulCycle (@soulcycle) on Jul 9, 2015 at 1:15pm PDT on Jul 9, 2015 at 1:15pm PDT
While this may not be true for all of the clientele, there's something about being shoved to the back of a room amid a sea of perfectly sculpted and tanned women with massive diamond rings, clad in SoulCycle's signature apparel, that doesn't make you feel great. Yet SoulCycle's marketing promises to help you be the best you, if you keep coming back (and buying the company's very expensive apparel with the word "SoulCycle" stamped across it!)
On its website, SoulCycle makes some lofty promises about how it will alter riders' universes: "forty-five minutes is all it takes to transform the way you look and feel," and more grandiose, "SoulCycle doesn't just change bodies, it changes lives." 

9. The wording in its IPO filing was ludicrous.

You can click here to read it, but be warned that it contains the words "tribal" and "primal."
That said, there are undeniably a few good things about SoulCycle. Some instructors really do say the right platitudes that keep you coming back (I know I have a few favorites still whom I would ride with again on occasion). Some instructors also offer classes that are structured more like traditional interval classes, and they shy away from the distracting dancing hi-jinks — but you have to go through many classes and instructors (and paychecks) to get there. And at the end of the day, anything that gets people off of the couch and exercising can't be entirely lambasted. 
We reached out to SoulCycle, and the company declined to comment, citing the quiet period before filing for an initial public offering.









 Original post found on
 http://news.yahoo.com/used-obsessed-soulcycle-until-realized-143746908.html

Hoping To Have Big Family? You Should Start Trying For A Baby Aged 23

Hoping To Have Big Family? You Should Start Trying For A Baby Aged 23

tumblr_inline_nscekw8tyM1tslwzc_1280
Scientists are hoping a new fertility calculator will prompt women to have children earlier. [Photo: Rex]
Another day, another scientific report about how we’ve all left it too late to have children – or at least more than one, anyway.
New advice suggests that women who’re hoping to have a big family should start trying for their first child at the age of 23 – before most of us even have got our careers on track or found someone serious to get pregnant with.
Scientists looked at fertility data from almost 60,000 women to create an at-a-glance calculator that advises ladies on when you should pregnant. In an ideal world, obviously.
The computer model, published by New Scientist, gives couples an idea of when to start trying for a baby, depending on how many children they would like to have.
Basically, if you’re over the age of 23 and hoping to have more than two kids then you may have a tough time conceiving all three naturally. 
.
tumblr_inline_nsceleTKkS1tslwzc_1280
As a woman ages, her ferility chances decreases making it harder to conceive naturally. [Photo: Rex]
A woman’s chances are measured in percentages, showing that a 23-year-old woman has a 90 per cent chance of having three children without IVF. At the age of 31, this figure declines to 75 per cent and aged 35 things look even bleaker, with just a 50 per cent of getting pregnant three times naturally.
If you’re happy with just two children, things look slightly better. According to the calculator, you can wait until you’re 27 to start your family and still have a 90 per cent chance of conceiving naturally. At 34 years old, you’ll still be in with a 75 per cent and aged 38 you’ll have 50 per cent chance of getting pregnant without IVF intervention.
Those hoping for one child have the best odds, unsurprisingly. A 32-year-old woman has a 90 per cent chance of conceiving without IVF, a 37-year-old has a 75 per cent chance and a 41-year-old woman is 50 per cent likely to have a baby naturally.
.
tumblr_inline_nscesjxk5Y1tslwzc_1280
Easier said than done! [Photo: New Scientist]
The chart also shows how IVF can increase a woman’s chance of getting pregnant – but of course there are a number of risks and side effects that come with IVF, such as ectopic birth, multiple births and Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, a rare complication associated with IVF.
Fertility experts reckon the table should be shown to sixth formers and uni students so that they’re aware of the risks of putting their career first.
“We haven’t got a time machine we can put people in… that’s just a blunt reality,” says professor Allan Pacey, a Sheffield University fertility expert.
“Everyone thinks you can wait – this shows you can’t.”

The Instant Effects of Diet and Exercise


The Instant Effects of Diet and ExerciseYour body responds the moment you begin making healthier choices. (Photo: Getty Images)
Part of the challenge in healthy living is that you see the effects gradually. That can be frustrating when you’re working hard in the gym and sticking to your diet.
But whether you see it immediately or not, your body responds the moment you begin making healthier choices. These changes can reduce your risk of obesity, heart disease, cancer and diabetes, all while making you feel better.
Controlling Blood Sugar Heads Off Disease
When you eat food containing carbohydrates, your blood sugar rises. How fast and how much it increases depends on how quickly your body is able to break down the food. One way of measuring this is the glycemic index, which ranks food on a scale from 0 to 100 based on how it affects your blood sugar. Foods with a high glycemic index are quickly broken down and cause sharper spikes in blood sugar levels, followed by dramatic drops.
Why does this matter? For one, sharp blood sugar fluctuations can increase your risk of Type 2 diabetes, and research has tied diets rich in high glycemic foods – such as white bread, white potatoes, soft drinks and candy – to increased risks of heart disease, diabetes and obesity.
“Fluctuating blood sugar causes fatigue, and high levels of insulin can lead to weight gain,” says Dr. Kristine Arthur, internist at Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center in Fountain Valley, California. “Over time, this can also cause chronic inflammation in the body.”
Controlling your blood sugar can also lead to:
  • Sustained energy levels. By opting for low-glycemic foods, you immediately help your body better regulate its blood sugar. This is better for short-term energy levels. “When you avoid that afternoon urge to have a donut and a soda, you immediately avoid this spike in blood sugar followed by the inevitable crash,” Arthur says. “By choosing a balanced snack of protein and carbs – like an apple with peanut butter or nuts – you are buying yourself balanced blood sugar and sustained energy levels for the next few hours.”
  • Greater mental clarity. Blood sugar fluctuations can also affect your mental clarity in the short term.Low-glycemic foods release a slower, sustained amount of glucose into your body, which can optimize focus, according to The Franklin Institute. Research has shown that dips in blood sugar – common when you haven’t eaten in a while or when your body is recovering from a spike – can impair concentration, learning and memory.
Cut Back on Caffeine to Improve Mood
Many of us would meet that afternoon slump with a cup of coffee, soda or energy drink. But research suggests that caffeine raises cortisol – the “stress hormone” – and chronically high cortisol levels can damage immune health.
In the short term, cortisol can make it difficult to handle pressure, and caffeine exacerbates the hormone’s effects. In other words, skipping a caffeinated drink can immediately help regulate this hormone and its short- and long-term effects.
Find Balance Through Exercise
“Exercise helps your breathing, which lowers your heart rate and blood pressure almost instantly,” says Dr. Nicole Weinberg, a cardiologist with Providence Saint John’s Health Center in Santa Monica, California.
These benefits aren’t only good for your cardiovascular system – they also help your mood. The rush of endorphins during physical activity can immediately boost your mood and reduce stress levels.
And like diet, exercise has immediate effects on blood sugar, minimizing energy peaks and valleys throughout the day.
Commit to a Healthy Lifestyle
“The benefits evolve over months, sometimes years. Physiologic changes will start quickly, but the true effect takes time,” says Dr. Mark D. Lurie, cardiology director at Torrance Memorial Medical Center in Torrance, California.
Delayed gratification is better than no gratification at all, but having to wait for the dramatic effects of a healthy lifestyle may drive some people to give up. A measure of trust has to go into eating right and being active –  trust that your body is making changes here and now, despite the fact that those results aren’t as visible as a drop in your pant size.
“Broccoli may not taste as good as fried onion rings, and watching TV may not leave us with the sore muscles of a good workout,” Lurie says. “But we all have to have our eyes on the prize – and the prize is lifelong good health.“


Fury after Bollywood star says death row bomber innocent

New Delhi (AFP) - Bollywood superstar Salman Khan urged India's top court Sunday to spare the life of a convicted bomb plotter due to be hanged this week, declaring him innocent and sparking a political furore.
The Supreme Court is expected on Monday to hear a last-ditch appeal from Yakub Memon, convicted of being a key plotter of a series of bomb blasts that killed hundreds in Mumbai two decades ago -- the deadliest such attacks in India's history.
The court had last week rejected what was believed at the time to be a final appeal from Memon, paving the way for his execution on Thursday after more than two decades in jail.
But his lawyers lodged the last-minute appeal, saying his execution date of July 30 had been set unlawfully back in April, before all legal avenues to appeal were exhausted.
Khan, a hugely popular actor who was himself convicted in May of a deadly hit-and-run accident, described Memon, an accountant by profession, as innocent, sparking protests outside his house.
"One innocent man killed is killing the humanity," Khan said on Twitter where he has 13.1 million followers.
"Get Tiger, hang him. Parade him not his brother," Khan said referring to Memon's brother Tiger, whom police say masterminded the attacks and who is still on the run.
The actor later retracted the comments after uproar from the ruling Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the opposition and a prosecutor involved in the case.
"The Supreme Court gave its verdict on hard core evidence and none of us are in position to undermine the verdict," said a BJP spokeswoman, Shaina NC.
The attacks are a religiously contentious issue in India because they are believed to have been staged by Mumbai's Muslim-dominated underworld in retaliation for anti-Muslim violence that killed more than 1,000 people.
The Bombay Stock Exchange, the offices of Air India and a luxury hotel were among the targets of the March 1993 blasts, which killed 257 people in India's commercial capital.
Eleven people have been convicted over the attacks, but alleged masterminds Tiger and Mumbai gang boss Dawood Ibrahim have not been caught.
Dozens of angry protesters, some waving BJP flags, converged outside the star's house in Mumbai, demanding he apologise to the victims' families.
The actor said on Twitter he was retracting the comments because they have the potential to "create misunderstanding", adding "I respect all faiths".
The furore came as a petition signed mainly by lawyers and politicians was given to Indian President Pranab Mukherjee urging clemency, partly on the basis that Yakub Memon has been languishing in jail for more than 20 years, the Press Trust of India news agency said.
A former Supreme Court judge, Harjit Singh Bedi, also said the court should take notice of reports Memon had cooperated with investigators and returned voluntarily from Pakistan where he fled after the blasts.
In a letter in the Sunday Express newspaper, Bedi said the court should examine whether these count as mitigating circumstances and refer the case back to the trial court for consideration.

Why I'm Secretly Hooking Up With My Ex

Nine years ago, my ex-husband Brian* and I had moved from Austin, Texas, to stay with my best friend Sarah* and her husband Dan* in their New England farmhouse. Brian had just quit his job and I was pregnant with our first child. We figured we would stay with them until Brian could find a job again, and then we would move out.

The living situation was working out so well. It seemed like a hunky-dory idea, Sarah and Dan, me and Brian — the four of us living happily together, under one roof. After we had our daughter Kim*, Brian convinced me to stay for another two years.
One afternoon, when I was pregnant with our second child, James*, I was upstairs in our bedroom while Kim was napping. I went downstairs to check on the laundry, and when I walked into the room, I saw Brian going down on my best friend. Sarah was sitting on the washing machine with her pants around her ankles, and Brian was going at it.


I later found out that Brian and Sarah had been sleeping with each other for two years, since Kim was born. It was almost laughable afterward when I put together so many obvious signs that I had refused to see for the longest time.

Like one time I remember, when they went to "drop off the trash" — because we were in a rural area of New England and didn't have garbage pickup — and they were gone for two hours. When they finally got back, I was like, "Where were you guys?" They told me that the guy there just talked their ear off for a long time. I was just like, "Oh, that's weird. That was a really long time. Let's go have lunch!"
After I caught them, I didn't move out right away. I wanted to try and convince Brian to end it with Sarah, and I spent months battling with the two of them. He ultimately told me he loved her but if I didn't want him to continue things with her then we would try to work on our marriage. I couldn't do it anymore though. I called my mother and I said, "I need to get out of here," and I left. Sarah and Dan also split up, and Sarah and Brian got married not long after.

Since we got divorced, the kids spend half the week with me and then half the week with Brian. It was awful when I first left because James was only a few months old and I was nursing. I would have to pump my breast milk and Brian and Sarah would be the ones to feed it to him.
It was a rocky road for us when we first separated and it stayed that way for the first few years, unless we were in front of the kids. It wasn't until about a year ago that we started growing closer again and then he told me that he was going to move out of Sarah's house. He told me that part of the reason it wasn't working out between them was because he still had feelings for me, and he could never forgive himself for what had happened. I felt insulted by it because he had been with her for all those years. I didn't say anything; I didn't want to.

After I didn't show any interest, he tried to work things out with Sarah and they went through marriage counseling. Every now and then I would check in and ask him how it was going. After a few months, he told me that it was finally over: He was moving out and filing for divorce. I was internally excited when he told me — I thought we could be friends, but I wasn't thinking about being anything more.
One night, he volunteered to pick me up from the airport when I would be returning from a family trip alone. He picked me up at 2 a.m., greeting me with a hot coffee and doughnut from Dunkin' Donuts. We had a two-hour drive back home, and we were reminiscing about things like when we used to live together and life before we were married. Then when we were arriving home, he said, "I'm a very patient person and I will wait; I just hope at some point, you'll give us another shot because it would be really great."
When we got back to the house, I invited him to sleep in my room. I told him nothing would happen, but we could just cuddle. We kissed and talked. Then in the morning he had to move down to the sofa because the kids knew that he was sleeping over and expected to see him there.
He went to work that day and we chatted online, shocked at what had happened the night before. That's when it all started up again and now we're secretly dating. I've told a few of my friends, and he's come out with me occasionally. One night, we went to dinner and then I took him to the dance studio where I do ballroom dancing. We don't want the kids to know though, so it's like, "I'll meet you at the parking lot around the corner in five minutes!"

For the seven years we've been divorced, it's always been so easy for me to date because I'll go out while the kids are with their dad. Now we need a sitter because he has the kids with him anytime I don't. We sneak around. He'll ask if I want to come over for dinner and I pretend that I am only there out of interest to see the kids. If the kids aren't around, we give each other quick little hugs, but the entire time, we're scoping out to make sure that Kim and James don't see. Whenever he stays over, if he hears a little footstep on the stairs, he will jump out of the bed and hide on the floor. We don't want to traumatize the children by letting them find out Dad was in Mom's bed.

Brian and I have been hooking up for a few weeks now, and we want to give it a few months to see how we feel before we talk to the kids about it. There are a lot of processing and conversations that need to happen, but we don't have a lot of time with the kids not around. We mostly just don't want to get their hopes up.
Recently, Kim asked me to cuddle with her when I was at Brian's apartment and then she invited him to get into the bed with us. She looked as happy as can be for a couple of minutes, and I realized it was the first time in her life that she's ever had the chance to cuddle with both of her parents at the same time. That's also when I realized that even though I felt OK with it, this could be weird for her later if we don't get back together. For now, I want to do what's best for the kids, and I am being careful. But joint cuddle sessions aren't careful.

I hope it works out for Brian and I, and in the best fairy-tale version of my life, we'll end up getting married again. I'm confident he won't cheat again, though I'm only confident because he was thoroughly traumatized from the divorce. I think he learned a lot, and I don't believe he'd choose to do it again, certainly not to me. People grow. I do worry whether I can really "get over it" and move on. I just want to have my family back — the kind of family that I have not been able to put together despite my best efforts in the last few years.
Copyright © 2015